Samuel Eaton was born about
1620, the son of Francis and Sarah Eaton. He came to Plymouth aboard the Mayflower in 1621. Governor Bradford
wrote that Samuel was a “sucking child” on the ship, indicating he was a baby. He
is my 10th great-grandfather on my grandfather Arthur Washburn Davis’
side of the family. I wrote about his parents here.
Samuel’s mother died during the
first winter at Plymouth. Sadly he was orphaned at about age 13 when his father
died in 1633. A few years later at the
age of 16 (in 1636), he was apprenticed to John Cooke for the period of 7
years. John Cooke had come on the Mayflower in 1620, as a 13-year old boy.
He was on the 1643 Plymouth list
of Men Able to Bear Arms.
Samuel married, first, Elizabeth, whose maiden name is not known, around 1646 (year
she acknowledged a deed as his wife). They resided in Duxbury, not far from
Plymouth. Surprisingly little is known
about this family. Samuel had two daughters with Elizabeth, whose names aren’t
known.
On 10 March 1646 Samuel Eaton of “Duxborough”
sold to Love Brewster the third part of land sometime belonging to Christian
Billington, wife of Francis, formerly wife of Francis Eaton (Samuel’s father).
The deed was acknowledged by Elizabeth Eaton.
In a 5 October 1652 court case,
Samuel Eaton, age 32 years or thereabouts, deposed and Rachell Ramsden
mentioned she heard Goodwife Eaton say Christopher Winter and Samuel Eaton were
together on Monday last. (Goodwife Eaton is assumed to be Elizabeth, Samuel's
wife, who she died after October 1652 but before January 1660/1).
Samuel married,
second, in Plymouth on 10 January 1660/61 Martha Billington. Martha was born
about 1638, the daughter of Francis and Christian (Penn) (Eaton) Billington.
Christian was Samuel’s stepmother. Martha’s father was a Mayflower passenger, as where her grandparents John and Elinor
Billington. I wrote about Martha's parents here.
He and
Martha had four children: Sarah, Samuel, Bethiah, and Mercy.
I
descend through Mercy who married Samuel Fuller, another Mayflower family.
In the
1660s, the family moved from Duxbury to Middleborough.
He died before 29 October 1684, when
his probate estate inventory was taken. He was of Middleborough.
The settlement of Samuel’s estate
mentions that the eldest child was to have the house and land that was granted to
Eaton by the town of “Middleberry” after his mother's decease; the daughter was
provided for by her Grandfather and was to have ten shillings at marriage or
when she is of age; and the children of the first wife to have the sum of 20
shillings apiece and such of them as are dead the sum by paid among their
children; and the two youngest children each to have their part at age or
marriage whichever shall first happen; the widow to have the remainder for her
relief.
Martha married,
second, after a 7 December 1687 ante-nuptial contract, Robert Crossman of
Taunton, born circa 1621 and died before 27 October 1692 when inventory of his
estate was taken. He was probably the son of John Crossman. He had married
first at Dedham, 25 May 1652, Sarah Kingsbury by whom he had 12 children.
On 4 October 1694 Martha
Crossman, daughter of Francis Billington, quitclaimed to Thomas Sawyer of
Marshfield land that her father gave to her then husband Samuel Eaton and
herself and after their decease to their daughter Sarah now wife of Philip
Bumpas.
Martha
died after 9 June 1704, possibly in Plainfield, Connecticut. On 9 June 1704,
Philip Bump transferred to his mother (in-law) Martha Crossman all his estate
both personal and real in Plainfield, Connecticut.
Sources Not Mentioned Above:
Eugene
Stratton, Plymouth Colony, Its History
and People, 1986
Mayflower Families Through Five
Generations, Volume Five, Edward Winslow and John Billington, published by the General
Society of Mayflower Descendants, 1997
Van
Antwerp, Lee Douglas and Wakefield, Robert, Mayflower
Families Through Five Generations, Vol. 9, Family of Francis Eaton, GSMD,
1996
No comments:
Post a Comment
I'm now moderating comments on this blog. My apologies for any ensuing delays, but the large number of "spam" comments have made this necessary. ~Chris